Cell phones cause cancer? no evidence!

<p> Super large-scale cell phone use and cancer will eventually come to a close relationship between cell phones cause cancer? no evidence! </ p> <wbr> <wbr> Beijing News weekly of the new knowledge <p> <wbr .> </ p> <p> "Use your mobile phone will increase cancer, in particular the incidence of fights!" you must have heard this argument. </ p> In fact, scientists have been trying to figure out is this true, .or nonsense. Recently, an international team released a massive, targeted at the "mobile phone use and cancer" epidemiological investigations. Agence France Presse (AFP) in the report of the study, stressed that this study indicates that "the use of mobile phones .and there is no obvious link between fights. "<p> <wbr> </ p> <p> Issue 1 </ p> <p> This study of what? </ p> <p> Answer: covering 13 countries 10000 .multiplayer. </ p> <p> <wbr> </ p> <p> This study is an international collaborative research, known as INTERPHONE, affiliated to the World Health Organization (WHO), located in France Lyon international cancer research (InternationalAgency .for Research on Cancer). </ p> The study is part of the case-control study (casecontrol), researchers will interview people with various types of cancer, and asked for their phone usage. And that is not suffering from interviews with cancer ., the situation is similar in the data compare. <p> <wbr> </ p> <p> Phone emits a low level of wireless electromagnetic waves, which affect the health is concerned, the study confirmed the use of mobile phones is hoped .will increase the risk of two main types of risk, fights between these two types of fights are glioma (glioma) and Meningioma (meningioma). </ p> Research involving 2708 name glioma patients and patients with Meningioma 7658 name, as well as the .name of the control group member 7658. <p> <wbr> </ p> <p> Research involving 13 countries, some of the results of the study have been published previously, but in the International Journal of Epidemiology (InternationalJournal ofEpidemiology) recent .papers is a consolidation of all research results in 13 countries. </ p> On some mobile phones was accepted by the company's financing, but the INTERPHONE project has full scientific independence ensures that the study of scientific rigor. <p> <wbr> < ./ p> <p> Issue 2 </ p> <p> The study found? </ p> <p> Answer: the normal phone seems to reduce cancer risk. </ p> <p> <wbr> </ p .> <p> Perhaps most people eager to see the conclusion of the study. </ p> Unfortunately, the research results have given very straightforward conclusion. Research indicates that, "overall, do not use mobile phones observed an increased risk of glioma and .Meningioma risk sign. "<p> <wbr> </ p> <p> From the survey, a regular cell phone use in fact even seems to reduce the risk of cancer. </ p> However, use your mobile phone for the .longest time that 10% of the respondents had the possibility of glioma is seems to be better than others by 40%. However, the study's report also points out that we also have reason to suspect that such information is the existence of practical relevance. < .p> <wbr> </ p> <p> This is really a make you feel tipsy. </ p> Use your mobile phone is able to protect us from cancer, or will let us cause cancer? <p> <wbr> .</ p> <p> The study found that the normal use of mobile human glioma and Meningioma risk appears to have declined by around 20%, but participated in the study of the United Kingdom branch of London Cancer Institute epidemiologists, Cavallo (AnthonySwerdlow) .that occur as a result, most likely on the result of design flaws. </ p> He said: "there is evidence that those who do not use cell phones would refuse to act as a control group." This shows that researchers in selecting .no cancer control group of people, among those options is to use the mobile phone of the person, so that relevant proportion occurs. But in the actual crowd, no cancer should have more people do not have the habit of using mobile phones. Therefore, ."control group of people using mobile phones in disproportionate." <p> <wbr> </ p> <p> At the same time, Cavallo has felt that use mobile phones in the "longest" of that 10% of the respondents, .some people report of mobile phone use time too "inconceivable" - for example, to use the phone every day for 12 hours. </ p> <p> <wbr> </ p> <p> On the INTERPHONE project the data collection .method validation study finds that asks participants to play a number of the phone, ask them to use the phone's total duration of the resulting data more accurate. </ p> If you use a data analysis, the highest number of "call" that 10 .% of the respondents did not show an increased risk of cancer. <p> <wbr> </ p> <p> Issue 3 </ p> <p> What is discovered before? </ p> <p> Answer: most .of the hard-copy related experiments. </ p> <p> <wbr> </ p> <p> Prior to this, there had been some animal and cell studies clearly show that the radiation from the early cancer cell phone class probability .increased. </ p> However, the academic community on this result had been doubtful, because these experiments are often very difficult to replicate. <p> <wbr> </ p> <p> Participated in the INTERPHONE project United Kingdom branch of .Leeds University epidemiologists McKinney (PatriciaMcKinney) that: "in General, the test cell biological and not persuasive, because there is no consistency of evidence, or you can explain this phenomenon and mechanism". </ p> <p> <wbr> < ./ p> <p> On the research in fact do not have to set up mobile phone use and cancer. </ p> However, bhubaneshwarLaurent also mentioned that a participation of Sweden's team found that mobile phone use increases the risk of cancer, but .he stressed that this should belong to the "value data" in the exception. <p> <wbr> </ p> <p> In addition, there is a need to highlight the situation. </ p> Whether you like it or .not, today's mobile phones are already ubiquitous. However, retrieving data since the advent of cell phones, cell phones in use, the statistical report on the brain seems to be no increase in total. <p> <wbr> </ p> < .p> Issue 4 </ p> <p> The final answer how? </ p> <p> Answer: cell phones and cancer does not establish any link between. </ p> <p> <wbr> </ p> .<p> Even if you are involved in the project researchers to work in meaningless completely agree. </ p> Some researchers obviously recommended to use mobile phones in public care and recommended should restrict mobile phone use. McKinney is stressed, even though they " .did not reach full conclusion ", but" we feel that we are standing on that phone is not risk most people over here. "<p> <wbr> </ p> <p> It is worth mentioning that adults only investigated the INTERPHONE .to use mobile phones, and not to provide any child using your mobile phone if there is a risk of the information, and this has been more controversial topic. </ p> <p> <wbr> </ p> <p> Similarly ., as the study time is because the studies did not provide any use mobile phone more than 15 years would risk data. </ p> Therefore, the relevant report: "frequently used mobile phones for a long time may take more research." < .p> <wbr> </ p> <p> Back to the general public were most concerned about cell phone use and cancer of the causal relationship between the end is what? through the large-scale study, the scientists give the answer is: .not established any connection. </ p> <p> <wbr> </ p> <p>, Cavallo said "evaluation of the epidemiological investigation is reflected in a causal relationship, there is a uniform evaluation standard. </ p> This .study's results have not been able to achieve this evaluation standards, failed to demonstrate the existence of a causal relationship. "<p> <wbr> </ p> <p> Compilation / xuqing </ p> <p> <wbr> < ./ p>.